The moat is collapsing. In software, that moat has already been eroded quite a bit, and now we even see news talking about the “end of software.” Other fields are similar, although the speed of change has not yet accelerated as dramatically as in software. But I think that’s only a matter of time. Because of that, lately I’ve started thinking again about the domain I originally came from: architecture.
Why did I not want to pursue architecture?
First, I disliked the structure of the industry. It feels stagnant, and it’s difficult to create leverage within it. Second, architecture usually doesn’t have a wide reach. The clients are limited, and architects mainly serve those clients. I wanted to work on things that create value and have an impact on many more people.
But I wonder if introducing AI into the domain of architecture could change this environment.
To be honest, I’m not very interested in optimizing or engineering the traditional pipeline of commission–design–construction. What I care about more is something else: helping people spend their time in spaces that truly match their tastes.
There is clearly a real demand for good spaces. And if AI changes the way people work—if being tied to a company is no longer the default—then the way we consume and use space might also change. Under these new ways of living and working, how will people interact with each other? How will they share spaces?
Are these thoughts too early?
If not, then how could the old architecture industry create a turning point in the way we experience and consume space?